Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index Doctor Who Club of Australia
45
Celebrating the 45th anniversary of Doctor Who
Sunday Nov 23rd at Drummoyne RSL Victoria Rd Drummoyne
11 am to 6 pm
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

12 - Favourite Colin Baker story
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index -> DWCA Monthly Poll

My favourite 6th Doctor story is...
The Twin Dilemma
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Attack of the Cybermen
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Vengeance on Varos
12%
 12%  [ 2 ]
The Mark of the Rani
12%
 12%  [ 2 ]
The Two Doctors
50%
 50%  [ 8 ]
Timelash
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Revelation of the Daleks
18%
 18%  [ 3 ]
The Trial of a Time Lord
6%
 6%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 16

Author Message
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1824
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: 12 - Favourite Colin Baker story Reply with quote

Here it is, the shortest month of the year - and I suddenly realise I forgot to include a poll of the month this month (oops!).

So, for the shortest month, what is your favourite story from the short reign of the 6th Doctor?


Last edited by Greg on Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
dave



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 608
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For me, The Two Doctors, because of Pat. The sontarans in this story were woeful, but Shockeye was truly terrifying at times. However, Pat and Fraser steal the show.
Back to top
Speckled Jim



Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 138
Location: Auckland, Un Zud

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah truly great, if short-lived, era of Dr Who - utterly bizarre and highly controversial. God, the scorn heaped upon the Baker era at the time....
Anyway, Two Doctors gets the vote from me mainly because it was so amazingly shocking at the time. Cannibalism was not a theme featured in most kids/adolescents' shows in 1985. And it had Sontarans, although they weren't as effectively used as in The Time Warrior or Sontaran Experiment.
Back to top
Sulp Niar



Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This season's maligned so often, I almost wish I could vote for more than one story just to even out the odds.

But it's got to be 'Revelation of the Daleks'. I don't want to go into detail, because, er, it should be pretty obvious to fans what I'd rave on about. Characters, plot (overarching plot threads; I don't understand the "Doctor doesn't show up for ages!" criticism, myself), direction, dialogue... the only problem with this story is that it's a crap Dalek story, but that's only because the name makes you expect, well, a Dalek story. Which it isn't, it's a Davros story. And in that sense - it's excellent!

dave wrote:
The sontarans in this story were woeful.


They are - and that's why I love them! They're teased mercilessly here, and even though the audience (like you and me) obviously find it hard to take them seriously, it should be noted that the characters in the story never take them seriously either (the number of times the villains talk about how stupid they are, and the Shockeye-holds-up-the-leg scene). So it's an internally consistent representation of the Sontarans (by the guy who created them!). The difference in opinion in fans, I suppose, would probably come down to whether deliberately portraying them as stupid is wrong in that fan's book.

Personally I love it. They're a bunch of jocks anyway. And even considering that, I find myself taking them more seriously than the Rutan in 'Horror of Fang Rock' - even though that's taken seriously for most of the story.

(Sorry Dave, I sort of used a brief comment of yours to go on a rant there)
Back to top
Tom N.



Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 144
Location: Sydney, NSW

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I voted for The Two Doctors. Even though Revelation is probably a "better" story, I find Two Docs a lot more entertaining. Pat Troughton, of course, is a delight - bit of a shame he didn't get more to do, but oh well.

Critics often say the overseas location was an unnecessary indulgence on JNT's part, but I think it works in the story's favour. I like the sunny Spanish setting, and have no problem with the "quick, we need to show off the local scenery" chase sequence. It's good to see somewhere outside the UK for a change, at any rate. (And as an aside, the Androgummified 2nd Doctor absolutely terrified this 8-year-old viewer! Razz)

Hoourable mentions to: Revelation, Vengeance on Varos, and The Trial of a Time Lord (which I like, even if it is a bit of a mess Wink )
Back to top
Speckled Jim



Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 138
Location: Auckland, Un Zud

PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Sulp Niar"]I find myself taking them more seriously than the Rutan in 'Horror of Fang Rock' - even though that's taken seriously for most of the story.[quote]

Hey, for a golf ball covered in string it was still pretty nasty.
Back to top
SharazJek



Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 902
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Revelation is the story that got me back into Dr Who after a 'hiatus' of a few years. Ironic because as soon as this episode finished the show went into a hiatus of it's own.

This has got to be one of the most macabre stories ever done in Dr Who. That's why I love it. It's the best Davros story ever, and superbly sequelled by the Big Finish audio of the same name.

Two Docs has all the ingredients [pun intended] but they never quite gel together for me.

I also enjoyed Mark of the Rani more than ever before when i saw it again on DVD.
Back to top
Sulp Niar



Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times

PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SharazJek wrote:
This has got to be one of the most macabre stories ever done in Dr Who. That's why I love it. It's the best Davros story ever, and superbly sequelled by the Big Finish audio of the same name.


[pedant]Prequel, isn't it?[/pedant]
Back to top
uhumanite



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 89
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I can not choose any of the wonderful BF's I'm going to go with Vengence on Varos.

Two Doctors gives us the last of the 2nd Doctor and the latter Dalek tale is wonderful for Davros's role, mark of the Rani gives us lovely sets and Kate Omara but no other story captures Colin's Doctor like Vengence.

Bar a tacky chair in the Tardis,slow patrols and some 80's hairstyles( its easy to find fault with any classic WHO in this era) I feel it stands up well as a partial satire of peoples views towards DR.WHO as a program at the time and Sil is by far one of the best monsters in a long while.

The "....and cut!" cliffhanger is the best in Colin's era and the show truly predates Big Brother.

An atmosphere extreme enough to fit Colin's coat!
Back to top
SharazJek



Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 902
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sulp Niar wrote:
SharazJek wrote:
This has got to be one of the most macabre stories ever done in Dr Who. That's why I love it. It's the best Davros story ever, and superbly sequelled by the Big Finish audio of the same name.


[pedant]Prequel, isn't it?[/pedant]


Your absolutely right!! My mistake.

It's Juggernauts that's the sequel isn't it!
Back to top
Sulp Niar



Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hooray! I'm helping!
Back to top
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1824
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anything that leads to attention for the awful Revelation of the Daleks is nothing to cheer about.

Long term readers of this forum know my very peculiar hatred of this story. It's not the worst Colin Baker story, but it is a very lazily written story that shows just how much writer/script editor Eric Saward was unsuitable for either job.

I'm restraining myself from going into a full-fledged rant here...
Back to top
uhumanite



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 89
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Twin Dilemma
Attack of the Cybermen
Time Lash

These are my list of what could have been great stories.

Twin- could have introduced 6 so well but apart from Colin's performance it is bogged down with slugs,eggs and 80's tac

Attack- a large budget but the script was so fanwanky it lost common sense for the average viewer. It even required a knowledge of the 10th Planet which is silly considering the last episode is missing. Needless references to the past shows a lack of original thought IMO.

Time Lash- A wonderful premise of a young H.G Welles learning about the unknown with The Doctor yet it is some how ruined with bland sets, SCIFI cheese and hardly any time for Welles to shine.

But I do enjoy the rest of Colin's stories and his BF audios put him as one of my fav Doctors.
Back to top
SharazJek



Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 902
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Greg wrote:
Anything that leads to attention for the awful Revelation of the Daleks is nothing to cheer about.

Long term readers of this forum know my very peculiar hatred of this story. It's not the worst Colin Baker story, but it is a very lazily written story that shows just how much writer/script editor Eric Saward was unsuitable for either job.

I'm restraining myself from going into a full-fledged rant here...


I disagree with you here Greg. While Saward was definately starting to get 'over' the show by this point, Graeme Harper's direction was the best of Colin's meagre collection of on screen stories.

For me, it was the Harper/Baker/Molloy combination that makes this a spectacular finale to series 22. There's much more to this than the script.

But rant away. I am curious to revisit your reasons for hating the ep.

Considering the classic contributions to the show's past (including Caves) I would have to say that Robert Holme's script was the most dissappointing of series 22, if we're talking purely in terms of scripts. If it weren't for Pat, Fraser & Jacqui I'd probably rate Mysterious Planet as a better Holmes story.
Back to top
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1824
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In summary, then:

The Doctor has no role in the story. He spends much of the first half wandering through the snow. Even when he arrives, the main action of the story is carried out by other characters. The characters least essential to the plot are the Doctor and Peri, and their small amount of action could be reallocated to other characters without actually damaging the story.

There's a character called Davros who is nothing like Davros. His mysterious flying and lightning-bolt shooting abilities aside, there is no reference to the previous story, he cackles like an idiot, and he sadistically manipulates and punishes people for his own pleasure. This is, at best, Davros the Bond villain and, at worst, Davros preparing to match wits with Batman and Robin (as played by Adam West and Burt Ward).

The Daleks are generic creatures who coincidentally look like Daleks.

Effectively, if you replaced Davros and the Daleks with (say) the Spidron and the Sorsons (from the Tomorrow People), you wouldn't need to change much of the script.

The script blatantly lifts much of its content (and some of its characters) from The Loved One and the movie Soylent Green. Tranquil Repose is Whispering Glades, Mr Jobel is Mr Joyboy, but Tasambeker is the opposite of the beautiful Aimee Thanatos, and I can only imagine Saward thought this was a clever twist. Oh, and soylent green is people, don't you know.

While this is far from the first time that Doctor Who has borrowed from other sources, at least other examples generally took the basic concept and put it into a different setting. The lazy Saward is only a few steps short of plagiarism (with his next script being Slipback, which he tries to write like he's Douglas Adams - and fails miserably!).

For a series that is known for characters thinking their way out of problems, here's a story where the solution is shooting and blowing things up. It may as well have been the A-Team.

I shan't bother to detail my contempt for Orcini and Bostock, characters who should at best be villains but are somehow effectively cast the heroes (given that the Doctor and Peri are pushed to the sidelines). IN fact, Saward obviously thought that he could include a number of double-acts and hoped he'd get some sort of Robert Holmes effect - Orcini and Bostock, Kara and Vogel, Natasha and Grigory. (Kara and Vogel are a poor imitation of Morgus and Timmin from The Caves of Androzani.)

and so on.

Seriously, I think you could put this story on and let it run with me telling you why I hate it at the same time, the story would finish before I did.

It's an example of why a writer should not be the editor of his own work.

I'm aware that many people love this story. It bewilders me why this should be the case.
Back to top
uhumanite



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 89
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Greg wrote:
In summary, then:

The Doctor has no role in the story. He spends much of the first half wandering through the snow. Even when he arrives, the main action of the story is carried out by other characters. The characters least essential to the plot are the Doctor and Peri, and their small amount of action could be reallocated to other characters without actually damaging the story.

There's a character called Davros who is nothing like Davros. His mysterious flying and lightning-bolt shooting abilities aside, there is no reference to the previous story, he cackles like an idiot, and he sadistically manipulates and punishes people for his own pleasure. This is, at best, Davros the Bond villain and, at worst, Davros preparing to match wits with Batman and Robin (as played by Adam West and Burt Ward).

The Daleks are generic creatures who coincidentally look like Daleks.

Effectively, if you replaced Davros and the Daleks with (say) the Spidron and the Sorsons (from the Tomorrow People), you wouldn't need to change much of the script.

The script blatantly lifts much of its content (and some of its characters) from The Loved One and the movie Soylent Green. Tranquil Repose is Whispering Glades, Mr Jobel is Mr Joyboy, but Tasambeker is the opposite of the beautiful Aimee Thanatos, and I can only imagine Saward thought this was a clever twist. Oh, and soylent green is people, don't you know.

While this is far from the first time that Doctor Who has borrowed from other sources, at least other examples generally took the basic concept and put it into a different setting. The lazy Saward is only a few steps short of plagiarism (with his next script being Slipback, which he tries to write like he's Douglas Adams - and fails miserably!).

For a series that is known for characters thinking their way out of problems, here's a story where the solution is shooting and blowing things up. It may as well have been the A-Team.

I shan't bother to detail my contempt for Orcini and Bostock, characters who should at best be villains but are somehow effectively cast the heroes (given that the Doctor and Peri are pushed to the sidelines). IN fact, Saward obviously thought that he could include a number of double-acts and hoped he'd get some sort of Robert Holmes effect - Orcini and Bostock, Kara and Vogel, Natasha and Grigory. (Kara and Vogel are a poor imitation of Morgus and Timmin from The Caves of Androzani.)

and so on.

Seriously, I think you could put this story on and let it run with me telling you why I hate it at the same time, the story would finish before I did.

It's an example of why a writer should not be the editor of his own work.

I'm aware that many people love this story. It bewilders me why this should be the case.


I agree with the lack of Colin's and The Doctor's involvement as I felt The Doctor did lack presence- poor Time Lord didn't even save the day but his presence is felt.
The Daleks are rather poorly voiced aswell and the DJ is a good pain.


Davros and Jobel are wonderful and the "cackling" I've always felt worked well with Davros's growing insanity (see Rememberence of the Dalek and mainly BF audios)

Had its' faults but far from rubbish (see Time Lash)
Back to top
Sulp Niar



Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Righto. I'll do my best to vaguely sort of go against your points and try to push for why it's my favourite Colin story.

Greg wrote:
In summary, then:

The Doctor has no role in the story. He spends much of the first half wandering through the snow. Even when he arrives, the main action of the story is carried out by other characters. The characters least essential to the plot are the Doctor and Peri, and their small amount of action could be reallocated to other characters without actually damaging the story.


True. This one comes down to whether that bothers you or not; for a series called "Doctor Who", it makes sense for the lead character to have some sort of involvement all the time. Yes, the most that the Doctor really does is suggest some sort of future for the blokes at Tranquil Repose.

And yet... I don't have a problem with this. I'm one of those folks who likes having stories presented in interesting ways from time to time - even if it ends up being a failure (can't think of any examples at the mo', but there are some, I think), which this doesn't. Personally, I don't feel that the Doctor has to have a huge involvement in the story, and it's more about seeing this story as a tapestry of characters all working towards the same thing. Usually it'd be a secondary character or two who'd have to sit on the sidelines and hang around for the finale; in this case, the Doctor does it all. Personally I like this; in the same way that, on the complete flipside, I like the end of 'Vengeance on Varos', where the Doctor basically overthrows the entire civilisation... and then the residents of Varos are left scratching their heads as to what to do next. It's both funny and more realistic for me; Saward's emphasis of showing how the Doctor often fails/is fairly useless is just a trait of the era that is interesting, in the same way that monsters-turning-out-to-be-not-what-they-seem is a trait of the Williams era (those black things from 'Nightmare of Eden' are drugs - I'm sure many who wanted a "proper" monster were annoyed about that).

Also, 'Mission to the Unknown' doesn't feature the Doctor, or involve him, in any way at all. Yes, this story leads into 'The Daleks' Master Plan', but in the boundaries of this particular mini-prelude, he's irrelevant (and in fact, throughout 'Daleks' Master Plan', it's often the guest characters who instigate things too, certainly in the first half of the story).

Greg wrote:
There's a character called Davros who is nothing like Davros. His mysterious flying and lightning-bolt shooting abilities aside


Er, what's wrong with him flying? Daleks can fly. Why not him? Otherwise, like the Daleks, how could he be much of a threat if he can't go up stairs?

Greg wrote:
there is no reference to the previous story, he cackles like an idiot, and he sadistically manipulates and punishes people for his own pleasure. This is, at best, Davros the Bond villain and, at worst, Davros preparing to match wits with Batman and Robin (as played by Adam West and Burt Ward).


Yes, that's true. And I feel they sort of missed a trick there, perhaps (though 'Davros', the BF audio, does this perfectly anyway, so I don't mind). But the previous two stories aren't really a framework for this story. For me, if anything, the problem with 'Destiny of the Daleks' and 'Resurrection of the Daleks' is that he's too much like Davros, by which I mean both David Gooderson and Terry Molloy were trying too hard to be the Michael Wisher version of Davros and largely failing (Molloy was less accurate, but actually better). Obviously that didn't work very well, so instead, 'Revelation' shows the Molloy interpretation of the role, and I personally love it, in all its differences. Don't get me wrong, Michael Wisher is supremely awesome - I come from 'Genesis' every time astounded beyond belief. But I do the same of 'Revelation'.

He's a cackling, manipulative barstard, but I don't see how that's a bad thing. It makes him more amoral, and nastier; his pushing of Tasambeker over the edge before just having her killed for the hell of it is irrelevant to the plot and his plans, but trapped in a funerary parlour and unaware as he is that he's about to be foiled (and keep in mind he's bloody careful with everyone else; the reason the Doctor does little in this story is that Davros made sure he couldn't, and brought him there just to take the piss), it makes sense that he'd do such horrible things with his employees just to pass the time. This is Davros we're talking about. He's no longer in a position where he has an absolute goal, like creating the Daleks to destroy the Thals. In 'Revelation', his ambition is purely to survive and stay hidden, employing his newly-made Daleks as slaves, so he gets more time to play nasty games with his pieces. Despite the universe hinted at, and despite the number of characters running through it, this is a very small-scale story.

So yeah, Davros is different; but I love that difference. When Davros cackles with glee before seeing the Doctor crushed by the statue (which has to be a practical joke), I laugh along with him, because it's genuinely funny. But Davros, come to think of it, doesn't cackle often in this story. He barely even rants that often. For most of the story, he's actually rather subdued and nastily quiet, which works just as well. And his panic at being captured by the Daleks is comparable to his panic upon learning that the Daleks were going to kill him in 'Genesis'.

Greg wrote:
The Daleks are generic creatures who coincidentally look like Daleks.


Indeed. But isn't that, uh, deliberate? If you were Davros, and you were afraid of the Daleks who did, let's be honest, try to kill you ('Genesis'; and he's obviously afraid of them at the end of this story), wouldn't you limit your Daleks to being but robotic creatures? To balance it out, we have proper Daleks come in at the end, but they don't go around killing people because they simply want Davros. That's fine with me.

Greg wrote:
Effectively, if you replaced Davros and the Daleks with (say) the Spidron and the Sorsons (from the Tomorrow People), you wouldn't need to change much of the script.


Uh... that's not a context for me. And, to be blunt... how many DW fans are going to notice this? Your later criticism is more on the money...

Greg wrote:
The script blatantly lifts much of its content (and some of its characters) from The Loved One and the movie Soylent Green. Tranquil Repose is Whispering Glades, Mr Jobel is Mr Joyboy, but Tasambeker is the opposite of the beautiful Aimee Thanatos, and I can only imagine Saward thought this was a clever twist. Oh, and soylent green is people, don't you know.


I'll be very quick to point uot that I haven't read or seen these two. And yes, that's indeed a problem... but for us to start criticising DW for lifting plots, characters and more from other texts, well, we've got a hell of a lot to account for. There's 'The Androids of Tara', for one, then there's 'The Brain of Morbius', 'Planet of Evil'... come to think of it, the Master himself is, as is openly admitted by the production team, Moriarty to the Doctor's Sherlock Holmes. I mean, I'm far more worried about the implications of that (and indeed, it's often realised very boringly, I feel) than I am about a few characters and their relationships being lifted from The Loved One.

Because... well, for a start, from what I can gather, Saward scripts it differently enough for it to work within the context of DW. It's a starting point, an idea that throws other things on it. I mean, I might be wrong, but I'd be very surprised if there was an Orcini character, a DJ character (which is an added blackly funny twist), or especially a Davros character in The Loved Ones. So in that sense, The core is The Loved Ones. The extensions, other plot threads and sci-fi bent make it 'Revelation of the Daleks'.

Greg wrote:
While this is far from the first time that Doctor Who has borrowed from other sources, at least other examples generally took the basic concept and put it into a different setting. The lazy Saward is only a few steps short of plagiarism (with his next script being Slipback, which he tries to write like he's Douglas Adams - and fails miserably!).


'The Brain of Morbius' and its setting of a spooky castle is worlds away from Frankenstein and its setting of a spooky castle, isn't it?

Yeah, 'Slipback' ain't great. Thankfully it's not a part of the TV series, so it's not something I feel like I should bother thinking about (it'd be like judging the Pertwee era after listening to 'The Ghosts of N-Space').

Greg wrote:
For a series that is known for characters thinking their way out of problems, here's a story where the solution is shooting and blowing things up. It may as well have been the A-Team.


'The Daleks' - the Doctor and his mates beat up some Daleks.
'The Power of the Daleks' - the Doctor blows up the Daleks.
'The Evil of the Daleks' - Daleks shoot some other Daleks.
'Death to the Daleks' - Galloway blows up the Dalek ship.

And that's just four Dalek stories.

But to be more accurate, I don't think that shooting and blowing things up is the solution, anyway. You can level that accusation at other Saward stories and I wouldn't mind ('Arc of Infinity' and 'Earthshock', for instance, though I like both endings), but for 'Revelation' it doesn't seem right. After all, the problem as we see it is Davros. The solution that they find isn't to shoot him, or blow him up. Davros falls because he's captured and taken away by the Daleks. It's 'Remembrance' that the Doctor tries to blow him up, not 'Revelation'.

The DJ might fit into the A-Team, though. Hey, that'd be fun. Er, sorry.

Greg wrote:
I shan't bother to detail my contempt for Orcini and Bostock, characters who should at best be villains but are somehow effectively cast the heroes (given that the Doctor and Peri are pushed to the sidelines). IN fact, Saward obviously thought that he could include a number of double-acts and hoped he'd get some sort of Robert Holmes effect - Orcini and Bostock, Kara and Vogel, Natasha and Grigory. (Kara and Vogel are a poor imitation of Morgus and Timmin from The Caves of Androzani.)


Since you mentioned 'Caves', I can go off on a tangent. Who's the hero of 'Caves'? Well, there isn't one. The most noble guys of the story - Chellak, blue-wearing soldier (I forget his name, sorry) and Sharaz Jek, of all people - are, in their own way, barstards. Even Timmin is. The Doctor isn't the hero of that story for anyone but Peri; he spends his time deliberately ignoring everything else happening on Androzani Minor, and it's only by chance that his involvement screws everyone over and sets things right (as far as we know, anyway).

Kara and Vogel are like Morgus and Timmin? Uh, how is that? So they've got a boss/secretary relationship. But they're worlds apart; Vogel doesn't attempt to betray Kara, and Timmin doesn't have any sexual tension with Morgus. Even the gender is reversed. Vogel's last scene with Kara is so different in relationship to Timmin's last scene with Morgus that this comparison is meaningless to me other than saying they have similar jobs.

It's very lucky that Graeme Harper came in to direct this story, because it wouldn't be so special without it. But that doesn't mean the story is inherently flawed and the direction covers over that (it's more solid and coherent a script, than, say, 'The Leisure Hive'); it just means that we're bloody lucky the right man came along to work on this script, in the same way that we're lucky Mr Harper also came on board to direct 'The Caves of Androzani'.

I still love it. To pieces. I'm aware that many people hate this story. It bewilders me why this should be the case.

(Haha, sorry, Greg. That was cheeky)
Back to top
SharazJek



Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 902
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good points from both sides.

One thing I didn't see mentioned though.

In both 'Love & Monsters' and 'Blink' the Doctor's involvement as the lead character is virtually non-existent. Arguably Blink is the cleverest script in series 3, possibly the entire series!

Although Revelation had no production reasons for keeping the Doctor and Peri out of the main plot for so long, perhaps the new series writers saw in this episode how it could be done and still make a great story.

But come to think of it, was the Doctor really out of the main plot? The whole point of him being on Necros in the first place was because Davros had lured him there.
Back to top
Davros



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 141
Location: Skaro

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would have voted Revelation of the Daleks but I haven't ["exterminate me"] seen it yet so I voted The Mark of the Rani as the Master is in it and he's my second favorite villian!

Last edited by Davros on Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:28 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
Sulp Niar



Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed on both points. For the latter, I suppose you could say that it's the first sign of Davros lowering his defences for the first time in ages and that leads to his downfall. Or it's just an amusing practical joke. I don't mind, both work for me, haha.

(Incidentally, that's something that always bugs me about 'The Mark of the Rani' - that criticism of, "Is it likely that three Time Lords end up in the same period of history accidentally?" Even the DWM review of the DVD took marks off for that. But uh, the Master chased the Rani, as he says, and he lured the Doctor in there, as he also says. So...?)

Yeah. I think the fact that 'Revelation' doesn't use the Doctor a lot - or indeed, the fact that you could argue that most of Season 22 doesn't use him a lot - and that being held against it, is strange. That's just a trend of this era, something that defines the stories; like how Ace is a big part of the plots of Season 26. It works for me, anyway.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index -> DWCA Monthly Poll All times are GMT + 11 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Web site hosting by Domain Hosting Shop - www.domainhostingshop.com.au